Trump’s recent tweet on Vladimir Putin, again raised
legitimate concerns about the president-elect’s favorable bias towards Russia
and the advisability of conducting foreign policy via tweets. Setting aside these concerns, Trump’s
assessment of Putin as being smart is very accurate.
Putin is much shrewder than Obama in international
affairs. Putin thinks strategically
while our President thinks tactically.
Witness Putin’s versus Obama’s approach to the civil war in Syria. Obama’s statement, “Assad must go”, was his initial
foray into the Syrian civil war. This
tactical statement gave verbal support to the opposition.
Unfortunately it was not followed up strategically. Obama ignored the advice of his Secretary of State and his Secretary of Defense to arm the Syrian rebels. The chance to overthrow Assad lost. Later it was strategically impossible to arm the opposition who became contaminated with Islamic terrorists.
Unfortunately it was not followed up strategically. Obama ignored the advice of his Secretary of State and his Secretary of Defense to arm the Syrian rebels. The chance to overthrow Assad lost. Later it was strategically impossible to arm the opposition who became contaminated with Islamic terrorists.
The President drew a red line regarding the use of
chemical weapons in Syria. Without
regard to strategic consequences, Obama cancelled promised military action to
uphold the red line. Obama’s feckless
behavior projected unreliability to our Middle-East allies and weakness to our
enemies.
Putin acted strategically.
He offered to broker the removal of Syrian chemical weapons. Acceptance by the U.S. of Russia’s role resulted
in several strategic advantages for Putin.
It ended the U.S. push for international isolation of Russia for its use
of military force in Crimea and Ukraine. It inserted Russia back into the middle-east
after thirty-five years of absence. What
followed was closer ties to Syria and its ally Iran, and the establishment of a Russian military base in the heart of the Middle-East.
The roles of the U.S. and Russia in the Middle-East flipped. Russia was now the key player in the Middle-East. The U.S. marginalized. In the past, Middle-East negotiations often
took place in the United States. This
time, the peace negotiations between Assad and the rebels was on Russian soil. The United States was not even invited to
participate.
Putin’s and Obama’s actions over Russian interference in
the Presidential election will hopefully be instructive to our next President. Acting tactically, Obama publically rebuked
Russia rather than just relying on retaliation through secret
cyberattacks. Hoping to hamstring Russian
relations with the next administration, Obama kicked out Russian ambassadors.
Acting strategically, Putin did not respond in kind. He did not retaliate by removing U.S.
ambassadors from Russia. In the process
Putin projected statesmanship and removed a potential black cloud hanging over
relations between Russia and the next U.S. administration.
Trump then made his infamous tweet about how smart Putin
is. Going forward, the question is
this. Will Trump, with his inflated ego,
realize that Putin is so much smarter than him?
No comments:
Post a Comment